Ranking points · 10 Aug 2026 table
Read 12 Aug 2026 · published 15 Aug 2026
5,919
World No. 4
Built from the best 18 results in the last 52 weeks — but only 16 exist. 2 slots sit empty, so every event entered adds points outright.
The ladder around them
- Grand Slams1,58027%
- 1000s3,90566%
- 500s601%
- Not itemized3746%
That share is real points the tour awarded that this page can't attribute to a specific result: tournaments outside Setlex's catalogue, events below tour level, and draw-size differences the standard points table doesn't capture. It's shown as a segment rather than a footnote, so every share on this page is a share of the real total — nothing here quietly means “of the itemized subset”.
Results in the 52-week window
1,845 points expire in the next 13 weeks — 1,000 of them at Wuhan Open, unless they're replaced.
How the count works
The 16 results carrying the ranking, biggest contribution first. 12 slots are mandatory — Grand Slams and WTA 1000s count whatever they scored; the rest are the best remaining results. A result expires 52 weeks after the event ended, so anything played before Aug 2025 has already dropped out.
2 empty slots
The ranking counts the best 18 results and only 16 exist, so there is nothing to displace — the next 2 events played add their full value, whatever it is.
What it takes to reach No. 3
That is 761 points, and with empty slots nothing has to be displaced. Any one of these does it:
- Win a WTA 1000 title1,000
- Reach a Grand Slam semi-final780
Read off the points table this site already ships, against the live gap to Jessica Pegula. Assumes the players above stand still — the honest caveat, stated rather than modelled.
Where the points come from — by surface
69% of the itemized points come on hard courts — and all 4 results expiring in the next 13 weeks are hard-court ones.
Keep it
The points expiring above are dated, so this page says something different every time it's opened — that's the reason to come back to it.