Ranking points · 10 Aug 2026 table
Read 12 Aug 2026 · published 15 Aug 2026
1,814
World No. 24
Built from the best 18 results in the last 52 weeks — but only 16 exist. 2 slots sit empty, so every event entered adds points outright.
The results below itemize 1,944 — 130 more than the official total, which cannot happen under a best-18 rule. The official figure is right; the overshoot is ours, from results we price for a bigger draw than the one that was played.
The ladder around them
- Grand Slams73038%
- 1000s41521%
- 500s54928%
- 250s25013%
Every result behind the total is itemized below, so each share is a share of the whole figure.
Results in the 52-week window
130 points expire in the next 13 weeks — 120 of them at Cincinnati Open, unless they're replaced.
How the count works
The 16 results carrying the ranking, biggest contribution first. 7 slots are mandatory — Grand Slams and WTA 1000s count whatever they scored; the rest are the best remaining results. A result expires 52 weeks after the event ended, so anything played before Aug 2025 has already dropped out.
2 empty slots
The ranking counts the best 18 results and only 16 exist, so there is nothing to displace — the next 2 events played add their full value, whatever it is.
What it takes to reach No. 23
That is 170 points, and with empty slots nothing has to be displaced. Any one of these does it:
- Win a WTA 250 title250
- Reach a WTA 500 semi-final195
- Reach a WTA 1000 quarter-final215
Read off the points table this site already ships, against the live gap to Maja Chwalinska. Assumes the players above stand still — the honest caveat, stated rather than modelled.
Where the points come from — by surface
44% of the itemized points come on hard courts — and all 2 results expiring in the next 13 weeks are hard-court ones.
Keep it
The points expiring above are dated, so this page says something different every time it's opened — that's the reason to come back to it.