Ranking points · 7 Sep 2026 table

Read 9 Sep 2026 · published 9 Sep 2026

3,770

World No. 5

8 of 19 counting slots filled — a new event adds points outright.

The ladder around them

+870to No. 450cushion over 6
Where the 3,770 comes from8 itemized · 1,040 not itemized
  • Grand Slams2,21059%
  • 1000s52014%
  • Not itemized1,04028%

Results in the 52-week window

Sort

400 points expire in the next 13 weeks.

How the count works

The 8 results carrying the ranking, biggest contribution first. 7 slots are mandatory — Grand Slams and Masters 1000s count whatever they scored; the rest are the best remaining results. A result expires 52 weeks after the event ended, so anything played before Sep 2025has already dropped out. Expiring points only cost the total what a replacement result doesn't win back.

What it takes to reach No. 4

870 points — any one of these does it:

  • Win a Masters 1000 title1,000
  • Reach a Grand Slam final1,300

Where the points come from — by surface

Hard1,820
Grass800
Clay110

67% of the itemized points come on hard courts — and the one result expiring in the next 13 weeks is a hard-court one.

Keep it

Compare with Auger Aliassime

Everything above is computed from what this page already loads: each event's points, level, surface and end date — expiry is just the end date plus 52 weeks — together with the published points table and the ranking list for the neighbours. Nothing is predicted and no probability is invented; the only assumption, stated on screen, is that rivals stand still.

Real results from tennis-api.com for the 52-week window ending 2026-09-07, the standings publication this snapshot reflects. Rank and total points are the player's official ATP standing; each event's round and ranking points come from the real draw result. Editions outside the data window are absent, so the breakdown's reconciliation line absorbs any gap to the published total.